Media Contacts:
Christopher Neal (202) 473-7229
Cneal1@worldbank.org
Jan Erik Nora (202) 458-4735
Enora@worldbank.org
WASHINGTON, June 14, 2004 A new World Bank study finds that credible
regulation is essential to ensure that reforms involving restructuring or privatization of
infrastructure utilities such as water, power, transportation and telecommunications
improve their performance and help reduce poverty.
"Getting infrastructure reform right is essential to achieving the Millennium
Development Goals on reducing child mortality and empowering women," says François
Bourguignon, the World Bank's Chief Economist and Senior Vice President, who directs
the Bank's Development Economics department, which produced the study. "While
there was probably some 'irrational exuberance' in recent years on the potential benefits
of privatization, the fact is that utilities in developing countries need private
financing to maintain and expand services to the poor."
The study launched at the Bank today, Reforming Infrastructure - Privatization,
Regulation and Competition, cites "effective regulation"as the most critical
enabling condition for getting infrastructure reform right. "Regulation that
provides a credible commitment to safeguarding the interests of both investors and
customers is crucial to attracting the long-term private capital needed to secure an
adequate, reliable supply of infrastructure services," the report says.
Specifically, the report notes that regulatory agencies must be free of political
influence, and that their decisions must be subject to review by the judiciary or
oversight by another non-political entity. Regulatory processes, it urges, must encourage
competition, be open and transparent, and be designed before privatization is
undertaken.
Privatization has low credibility in many developing countries, the study finds, with
disapproval rates over 80 percent in surveys conducted in Argentina and Peru. The report
argues, however, that this dissatisfaction with privatized utilities is not due to their
ownership structure, but rather to the weakness of institutions charged with regulating
them.
Regulatory weaknesses explain most failed attempts at infrastructure reform and
privatization in developing countries, says the report's lead author, Ioannis Kessides,
a lead economist at the World Bank. "There are cases where privatization was
undertaken without institutional safeguards and conducted in ways widely considered
illegitimate," Kessides points out. "Privatization is no panacea,
and neither is returning to the 'old ways' of wasteful, inefficient publicly-owned
utilities."
Reforming Infrastructure reviews utility reform and privatization experiences in
many developing and transition countries, drawing lessons aimed at helping policymakers
avoid the pitfalls. It addresses the specifics of regulation and pricing to achieve an
optimal balance between economic efficiency and universal service.
"A broad range of investment in infrastructure, including both public and
private, is needed to achieve the Millennium Development Goals," says Nemat
Shafik, the World Bank's Vice President for Infrastructure. "To get there we
must clearly find ways to reverse the recent decline in private investment in
infrastructure in developing and transition countries. This study reaffirms that pricing
must provide investors with an incentive, but that there is also a continued need for
well-designed subsidies and targeted safety nets to ensure that the poor benefit from
efficiencies and gain access to vital services."
Reforming Infrastructure finds that private financing for infrastructure peaked
at $130 billion in 1997, then dropped to $60 billion in 2001, due to falling stock markets
worldwide, financial crises in emerging markets, and hesitancy caused by public opposition
to privatization. But the old state-owned approach offers little promise, the study
reports, as publicly-owned utilities in developing countries, taken together, incurred
losses of about $180 billion a year in the early 1990s due to inefficiencies in water,
railroads, roads and electricity nearly as much as annual investments in those
sectors.
But, even though private sector participation in infrastructure has prompted increased
investment and expanded services coverage, the reality is that 1.1 billion people still
lack access to safe drinking water, 2.4 billion people live without adequate sanitation,
and 1.4 billion make do without electricity. To address these needs and to achieve the
Millennium Development Goals, the Bank's Global Development Finance 2004 report,
released in April, found that developing countries need $120 billion a year from now to
2010 in infrastructure investments in the electricity sector, and $49 billion a year up to
2015 for water and sanitation.
Reforming Infrastructure draws distinctions among sectors in identifying
candidates for privatization. It singles out the telecommunications sector as providing
the most compelling case for privatization and liberalization in developing countries,
while power and especially water are more problematic. In the water sector, concessions
and leases are recommended as more effective ways to achieve the efficiencies of
competition while retaining strong public oversight.
"Many countries can benefit from careful privatization of services if they do
things right and don't oversell the benefits," says Michael Klein, Vice
President for the joint World Bank/IFC Private Sector Development department and IFC Chief
Economist. "Regulatory oversight must be in place. The awards process must be
transparent. And privatization must address the needs of the poor, particularly by
extending service coverage."
A major recommendation of the report is that a key to successful restructuring of old
public monopolies is "unbundling", that is, breaking down the original monopoly
in various private or, possibly, public entities, within the same utility or sphere of
activity that is exposed to competition.
The remaining natural monopoly components, meanwhile, should be subjected to close
oversight or retained under public ownership. The study warns, however, that such
unbundling, "makes the regulatory task more complex, which is likely to be a
problem in environments with weak governance as in most developing and transition
economies."
The report and related materials will be available to the public on
the World Wide Web on June 14 at:
http://econ.worldbank.org/
Media outlets are encouraged to use this url in their reports.